The impact of human factors on the participation decision of reviewers in modern code review
Authors -Shade Ruangwan (Nara Institute of Science and Technology),Patanamon Thongtanunam (The University of Melbourne), Akinori Ihara (Wakayama University), Kenichi Matsumoto (Nara Institute of Science and Technology)
Venue – ソフトウェアエンジニアリングシンポジウム2019
Abstract – Modern Code Review (MCR) plays a key role in software quality practices. In MCR process, a new patch (i.e., a set of code changes) is encouraged to be examined by reviewers in order to identify weaknesses in source code prior to an integration into main software repositories. To mitigate the risk of having future defects, prior work suggests that MCR should be performed with sufficient review participation. Indeed, recent work shows that a low number of participated reviewers is associated with poor software quality. However, there is a likely case that a new patch still suffers from poor review participation even though reviewers were invited. Hence, in this paper, we set out to investigate the factors that are associated with the participation decision of an invited reviewer. Through a case study of 230,090 patches spread across the Android, LibreOffice, OpenStack and Qt systems, we find that (1) 16%-66% of patches have at least one invited reviewer who did not respond to the review invitation; (2) human factors play an important role in predicting whether or not an invited reviewer will participate in a review; (3) a review participation rate of an invited reviewers and code authoring experience of an invited reviewer are highly associated with the participation decision of an invited reviewer. These results can help practitioners better understand about how human factors associate with the participation decision of reviewers and serve as guidelines for inviting reviewers, leading to a better inviting decision and a better reviewer participation.
Preprint – [PDF]
Ruangwanさん（奈良先端大）との共著論文（著者に伊原先生を含む）を国内会議SES2019（東京）で招待発表しました．紹介した論文は上記の通りです．
